Skip to the arithmetic
Dosing ArithmeticVial yield and repeat-interval arithmetic, on figures you supply.

An interval of 168 hours

The interval held fixed at 168 hours while the half-life varies. At a 24-hour half-life, 0.8% of one amount survives the gap and the peaks approach about 1.01 times one amount.

Educational arithmetic only. Not medical advice and not a dosing protocol.

An interval of 168 hours against eleven half-lives. The interval is held fixed and the half-life is the variable, which is the useful direction when the half-life is the figure you are least sure of.
Half-lifeIntervals per half-lifeSurviving the gapLimit the peaks approachIntervals to within 1%
2 hours84.000.0%1.00x1
4 hours42.000.0%1.00x1
6 hours28.000.0%1.00x1
12 hours14.000.0%1.00x1
24 hours7.000.8%1.01x1
36 hours4.673.9%1.04x2
48 hours3.508.8%1.10x2
72 hours2.3319.8%1.25x3
120 hours1.4037.9%1.61x5
168 hours1.0050.0%2.00x7
336 hours0.5070.7%3.41x14
How much the limit moves if the half-life you relied on is out by a factor of two either way. Published half-lives for one compound often differ by more than this between studies, so the spread across a row is the honest uncertainty in the figure.
Assumed half-lifeIf it is half thatAs assumedIf it is double
12 hours1.00x1.00x1.01x
24 hours1.00x1.01x1.10x
48 hours1.01x1.10x1.42x
72 hours1.04x1.25x1.80x
168 hours1.33x2.00x3.41x

What is particular to this interval

A week, the longest spacing here. Every half-life under two days has gone to one: a week is more than three half-lives for all of them, which leaves under an eighth of an amount and almost nothing to carry forward. Only the top two rows of the table accumulate at all, and the 336-hour row is the one case on this site where a weekly gap still leaves most of an amount behind.

Why the second table is the more useful one

Because the half-life is almost always the figure you are least sure of. A spacing is something you chose and know exactly; a half-life came out of a paper, belongs to the population and formulation that paper measured, and can differ between studies by more than the precision anyone quotes it to.

So the second table asks what happens if the figure is wrong by a factor of two either way, which is well within the range published values for one compound can disagree by. The spread across a row is the honest uncertainty in the accumulation figure, and it is usually much larger than anybody expects.

The ratio is the only thing that matters

Only the interval divided by the half-life appears in the arithmetic. The fraction surviving a gap is 0.5 to that power, and the limit is one over one minus that fraction. Which means a 24-hour interval at a 24-hour half-life and a weekly interval at a weekly half-life are the same calculation on a different clock: both give half surviving and a limit of exactly 2.

The half-life pages are the same grid read the other way. If the figure you are confident about is the half-life, start there; if it is the spacing, start here.

What this page is not

It is not a suggestion that anything happen every 168 hours. The figure is one of six spacings swept so that the shape of the function is visible across the range it is useful over, and every row of every table here is a parameter rather than a proposal.

It is also not about a compound: no substance is named on this page or anywhere on this site. What this does not do sets out that boundary in full, and it is the longest page here for a reason.

Elsewhere on this site